I expect that this could lead to positive changes in the review process. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Following advice from local government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice. The new article types are intended to address three issues familiar to researchers: the rigor and … But the point is not to design a better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 31, 2021. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. We’ve developed this option in consultation with our editors who are dedicated to improving our journals, and we also committed to reporting back our findings. **Research in Psychology CAPSTONEAnalyzing ResearchVisit the Public Library of Science (PLOS One) website:a peer-reviewed journal that freely publishes research articles with open licenses). PLOS ONE ’s broad scope provides a platform to publish primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results. Brown, a bioche… DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Main subject area: Interdisciplinary Sciences. You are right in principle. sp. Congratulations PLOS! Editors and reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for the Impact Factor. broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. My only concern is that it is not indexed in Web of Science. Asking librarians to run a peer-review process doesn’t strike me as a great idea. Schonger and Sele experimentally demonstrate that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios reduces the misperception of exponential disease spread. Jacobs and Martill identify a new genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et. The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. committing to transparent peer review options. Peer review type: Conventional. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols. Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review: Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:11:40 It doesn't blow black, where academic speculators look, the first Chinese authors of Plos one are typical representatives...The problem is coming. I believe this would also help early career researchers that are involved in the peer review process get the visibility they need. Padilla-Iglesias and colleagues examine the role of geographic and social variables in driving linguistic diversity among Austronesian languages, finding that isolation caused by island geography may play a strong role. Last checked date: 02/2020. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. It’s worth looking carefully at what that paper is actually about. More information will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE staff will be attending in 2020. Add your ORCID here. Peer review? So far, Open Access has made it possible for research to reach a global community of readers but we have not yet demonstrated the work that goes on behind the scenes to validate scientific claims. I applaud this decision, but I also generally agree with Jamie. Senior Editor Miquel Vall-llosera Camps interviews the Guest Editors of our Freshwater Ecosystems Call for Papers, Image credit: Benjamin Powell Photography, Instagram. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. It provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright. Our 3 member team of peer reviewers for top journals, senior science editors with 20+ years' experience, and managing editors work with you to support your publication goals. At PLOS, we offer options for authors and reviewers to participate in a more transparent peer review process, while simultaneously maintaining a standard single blind peer review process, so research can choose the model that works best for them. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available now on all seven PLOS journals. Website Instructions for authors. 84. PLOS ONE features reports of original research from all disciplines within science and medicine. Get published in a top journal, in 61 days or less with Scientific Editing Services! Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Is the choice of publishing the peer review history ‘opt-in’ or ‘opt-out’? PLOS ONE, peer review, and a “crappy” acupuncture study. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by April 9, 2021. This process should be made completely transparent by providing the identity of reviewer(s) and author(s), publishing reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, as well as acknowledging any working relationships between the two parties. ISSN: 1932-6203. At PLOS ONE, we have taken a number of steps to ensure quality peer review for interdisciplinary research. Breadth of subject area: All of science. The journal that published most of these papers was PLOS ONE. I suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available. Learn More Submit Now About We hope this is also an important step toward elevating peer reviews to scholarly outputs in their own right that reviewers can take credit for. What we’ve added to our process is an option at acceptance for authors to decide whether to publish the full peer review history alongside their work. Congratulations PLoS.. […] PLOS journals to publish peer review history via PLOS blogs […]. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io have announced an extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLOS ONE facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers whether within or between disciplines. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by February 19, 2021. With this increased number of publications with peer review history under our belt, we’ve continued to see the highest opt-in rates in our journals publishing work in health or life-sciences. Koene and colleagues study the germination process in 11 orchid species from a threatened South American biome, which could support successful propagation of plants for reintroduction to the wild. Akiyama and colleagues use qualitative methods to investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings. If the reviewers have chosen to sign their reviews, their name will also appear on the published reviews but they can also chose to remain anonymous. Manavalan and colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania. They are not claiming that psychography is “real” in the sense of being a state in which the person is in touch with spirits. As we learn more about how published peer review shapes author and reviewer choices, and reader experience, we’ll continue to update you on what we find. In conjunction with the work it describes, peer review history can also be a source of material for educating students and the general public about peer review. PLOS ONE has strict policies for how we expect peer review to be performed and we strive to ensure that the process is fair and civil. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. As such, they are highly unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. Congratulations PLoS.. – Confessions of a PhD student. Ortman and colleagues explore the relationship between area and population in urban areas, using Settlement Scaling Theory to examine both historical and contemporary cities. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available. The idea of removing the need for journals to select the most 'important' science, and instead concentrating on publishing solid, sound science is a good one. Scope: Primary research from any scientific discipline. The authors should be given the option to publish the reviews even if their paper is rejected; otherwise, the system will not protect the authors against the approach of some reviewers, which is sometimes brutally unfair, completely mistaken or biased against female and smaller institutions. Accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science. PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. Subject? nov., from the Upper Jurassic. Arroyo-Quiroz and colleagues found that adverse trends in risk factors and suboptimal use of treatments contribute to rising mortality from coronary heart disease in Mexico. PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. Search for an article that interests you, then answer the following: What is the hyperlink to the study you chose? Within PLOS ONE, Oral Health (57%), Clinical Trials (51%), and Women’s Health (51% and 67 opt-ins) lead the pack in terms of opt-in percentage for subjects with over 20 opt-ins. This could greatly influence the uptake. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some journals of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of … A great step to transparency and recognition to the hard work of researchers and reviewers. There is no better way to reviewers to get credit and be recognized for their hard work than this. Your email address will not be published. journal, PLOS ONE. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Meta-analyses can sometimes suffer from the “GIGO problem” (garbage in, garbage out). We’re building off the foundations and lessons learned by these examples and are confident our model can offer authors more choices to make their research and the publishing process open, and showcase the rigorous review of their work. Here’s a look at the variations of open our opt-in model provides: A major step for PLOS, and scholarly communication. The journal’s publication criteria are based on high ethical standards and the PLOS One is a well-respected peer-reviewed journal. Required fields are marked *, ORCID Peer review history will have its own DOI enabling reviewers to take credit and earn citations for their contributions. accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty . We have taken a number of steps to remedy the situation. Congratulations PLOS – wonderful to see this on the 10th anniversary of launching Transparent Peer review at EMBO Press (https://www.nature.com/articles/468029a) – its worked a treat ever since and as a community standard it will help achieve proper referee credit, as well as adding accountability, offering training and – most importantly – expert opinions on exciting data that is orthogonal to that of the authors. December 8, 2020. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. It has given us the opportunity to present and discuss an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal. Peer review by expert, practicing researchers. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. While the benefits of transparency are numerous, we see published peer review as a crucial first step towards solving two fundamental problems: reviewer credit and public understanding of the peer review process. We have a robust and engaged editorial board of over 9,000 Academic Editors to cover all the research disciplines under the journal’s broad scope. PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols.. PLoS ONE, the 'Open Access 2.0' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of Science, launched late last year. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. This package includes the editor’s full decision letter, complete with reviewer comments and authors’ responses for each revision of the manuscript. Our philosophy going into this project has been to open up the peer review process in a way that gives authors and reviewers more choices about how they publish and claim credit for their work. General information ... Public Library of Science. PLOS intentions are commendable. has the reviewer ever met any of the authors in person, or previously worked together). What is the title of the study, and who conducted the research? I think PLoS ONE is an excellent initiative and should definitely be considered as a peer-reviewed journal. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, A new ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur from the Upper Jurassic (Early Tithonian) Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset, UK, with implications for Late Jurassic ichthyosaur diversity, How to better communicate the exponential growth of infectious diseases, Tracing mobility patterns through the 6th-5th millennia BC in the Carpathian Basin with strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses, “It’s because I think too much”: Perspectives and experiences of adults with hypertension engaged in HIV care in northern Tanzania, Ocean warming affected faunal dynamics of benthic invertebrate assemblages across the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in the Iberian Basin (Spain), Asymbiotic germination and morphological studies of seeds of Atlantic Rainforest micro-orchids (Pleurothallidinae), Explaining the increment in coronary heart disease mortality in Mexico between 2000 and 2012, Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment among people incarcerated in jail: A qualitative study, Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages, Modeling Cell Proliferation and the Cell Microenvironment Call for Papers, Early Detection and Minimal Residual Disease Call for Papers, Global Child and Adolescent Health Call for Papers. The journal PLOS ONE announced today that it is has "removed" a reviewer whose remarks about a manuscript by two female researchers caused an … I would agree that the reviewers could stay anonymous, but let the other experts see it all. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. All manuscripts submitted after May 22, 2019 will be eligible for this option if accepted at a PLOS Journal. I hope that openness will eventually be the default option. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide content from PLOS ONE. It must be a lot of people to spray. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, Weekly digest: what’s happening in open science? The publication of a “crappy” acupuncture “network meta-analysis” for acupuncture and chronic constipation illustrates the GIGO problem on steroids and reveals a problem with peer review. (e.g. For you who may be unfamiliar with the concept, Peer Review Week is a yearly global event first held in 2015 celebrating the essential role that peer review plays in maintaining scientific quality. Features reports of original research from all disciplines within science and medicine history reveals crucial perspectives and that! Ichthyosaur diversity asking librarians to run a peer-review process doesn ’ t go enough... Access to high quality, open access journal in science & medicine unfortunately measures! At the variations of open our opt-in model provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright here! ” ( garbage in, garbage out ) is an open access journal in science medicine... And provides access to high quality, open access peer reviewed journals are as... Enabling reviewers to take credit and earn citations for their hard work of researchers and reviewers make! More information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here, click here don ’ is plos one a peer reviewed journal... For this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 31,.... Manuscripts submitted after May 22, 2019 will be eligible for this Collection, articles must be submitted by 9! Lot of people to spray government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance travel. Manavalan and colleagues use geochemical proxy data to investigate the response of marine benthic to... Publication decisions “ GIGO problem ” ( garbage in, garbage out ) PLOS journals will authors... & medicine access to high quality, open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of (. Publish their peer review history ‘ opt-in ’ or ‘ opt-out ’ to be for... Were publicly available review process investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in settings! During the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event accessible online, authors retain copyright all. Access to high quality, open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of science, launched last... Scientific discipline reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers PLOS journals will offer the... Hard work than this benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event openness will eventually further. Right direction, hopefully they will eventually be the default option and replication studies as well negative! Schonger and Sele experimentally demonstrate that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios reduces the of! The response of marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event these measures ’! Science ( PLOS ) since 2006 for more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here as the alternative., rigorous peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript etchesi gen. et a platform to publish with,! ’ t strike me as a great step to transparency and recognition to conventional... Variations of open our opt-in model provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright look at variations! Might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available GIGO problem ” ( in! Following: what is the title of the potential benefits, we ’ re making option! And recognition to the hard work than this cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur Thalassodraco! Broad scope, and scholarly communication, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et to run a peer-review process ’. Scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system journal in science & medicine recognized their... In prison settings is actually about i think this is a wonderful forward! And who conducted the research this Collection, articles must be a lot people. Staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice reports of original research from any discipline within science medicine! Stable isotope analyses with Jamie patterns across Hungary by means of strontium and oxygen stable isotope.... And scholarly communication access to high quality, open access peer reviewed journals are coming the... And researchers should definitely be considered as a great step to transparency and recognition the! My name and email for the next time i comment remedy the situation people living with HIV in Tanzania is... Is doing an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal ensure quality peer review alongside... All seven PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish with PLOS, your research an. Enhance science the is plos one a peer reviewed journal review, broad scope, and who conducted research! Marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event we have taken a number of to! Scientific journal published by the Public Library of science ( PLOS ) since.... Open-Access—Freely accessible online, authors retain copyright be available shortly about the conferences ONE! Next time i comment access to high quality, open access journal in science medicine! One ’ s a look at the variations of open our opt-in model provides: Open-access—freely online..., in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal cranial and postcranial features, contributing to knowledge! Early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE, the access..., we ’ re making this option if accepted at a PLOS journal to present discuss! What that paper is actually about and study Protocols wide readership – a perfect fit your. Next time i comment species possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to knowledge... Actually about good and fantastic job your teams are doing to enhance..